Understanding is a wellspring of life unto him that hath it:
but the instruction of fools is folly.
Proverbs 16:22

Friday. 23rd April 1999, and BBC ‘News reported a fossil find which they announced may be an ancestor of mankind.

The tiny chippings of skull and upper jaw are hoped to reveal the animal which immediately preceded and thus evolved into man.

These fragments have been found at Bouri in Ethiopia along with fragments of tools, human-like leg bones and ape-like arm bones.

If Evolutionists can find cause to say that all these things came from the very same animals then, hocus pocus, they have a new hominid – indeed: the missing link itself!

These clever chappies have even named the newly-discovered human ancestor, Australopithecus garhi – garhi being the local word for ‘surprise’.

However, garhi garhi, they have not yet shown any-biological connection between the different ani facts and fossils found at the site – they have named an animal without any proof that it really existed.

They have even compared the animal by anatomical analysis and measurements of the bones found with other hominids like the science fictional Lucy, even though the Bouri limb bones stand every chance of not actually being related in any way to the skull fragments.

Is this science?

C. Harris
(From the Monarch Standard 1999)